Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Buffett Rule trumped by filibuster rule

In spite of a majority of Senators voting to pass the Buffett Rule creating a minimum tax rate for those making over a million a year, the bill failed.  Along an almost straight party line vote, the Buffett rule did not muster the 60 votes needed to stop a potential filibuster.
With 60%of the public and 57% of small business owners supporting a minimum tax rate on incomes over a million a year, the nation’s wealthiest can sleep well this tax day knowing that the our federal tax inequality is safe, at least for now.  
But the executive director of Center for Community Change, Deepak Bhargava, says in an opinion editorial in The Hill’s Congress Blog today that a tax revolt 2.0 is brewing.  According to Mr. Bhargava, the old Grover Norquist-style tax revolt has passed “like the Cold War or the fax machine.” 
Well, just like I still sometimes use a fax machine, the “never-raise-taxes” revolt is not completely dead.
Yesterday I participated in the national Buffett Rule battle and appeared for a live cut-in on Fox Business News. (No, Hell hasn’t frozen over but Fox did fail to identify me as the Vice-Chair of the American Sustainable Business Council even though that is how I received the invite.)
You can see the clip here. 
Now on to House Majority Leader Cantor’s bill to cut small business taxes on profit by 20% with the absurd prediction that this will inspire job creation.  More on this tomorrow.


  1. Just once you believe you have discovered it all, I found out the federal government levies taxes on the income narcotic dealers make on the substances they offer. The IRS has special procedures where narcotic dealers are permitted to anonymously take care of taxes on the sale of unlawful drugs. Here is the big kicker, the government is just not able to turn the dealer in for drug dealing, they will be merely allowed to collect the taxes and report the name, to ensure that when supplier is grabbed for dealing drugs, the prosecution cannot really charge them with tax evasion. I am not kidding, discover for yourself. http://ww.tax-defense-network-tax-laws.com/tax-defense-network-illegal-drug-tax/

  2. I couldn't agree more, Stew. Also, I got an Internal Revenue Service letter called CP-11, however I did not know precisely what I was in fact supposed to use it and why the IRS is capable of generate adjustments to my income tax which would leave me having a back tax debt due. I believed it was done intentionally and would definitely head over to court over it until finally I uncovered the calculation the Internal Revenue Service adjusted. In case you acquire a CP-11 notice, research your return before you try to dispute the change. http://www.tax-defense-network-cpnotices.com/cp-notice/47-2/

  3. Tax Defense Network states the goal of a PPIA is to allow taxpayers with some ability to pay their tax debt an IRS program that they could benefit from.